Former FCA Chair Slams Proposed Crypto Regulation From Government

Randell, who was chair of both the FCA and Payment Systems Regulator between 2018 and 2022, attacked the proposals that would label crypto as an investment, "but without many of the same rules".

These include an "as yet unspecified" liability and capital regime for issuers and intermediaries, a potentially looser regime to judge whether intermediaries are acting in the client's best interests, as well as an initial "lighter touch" approach to market abuse, and possible delegation of the first line of market abuse surveillance to a crypto industry association.

Treasury finalises plans to regulate crypto industry

On 30 October, the Treasury finalised its plans to regulate the crypto industry following a consultation, incorporating it into the existing regulatory framework for traditional financial services.

However, Randell noted that the proposed regulation does not contain "any of the cost-benefit analysis that the government requires from the FCA", instead focusing on the popularity amongst respondents to the consultation, who "stand to make money from boosting crypto".

"There is no attempt to quantify the consumer harms that could result from holding crypto out as a regulated investment," he added.

The former FCA chair claimed that the "fraud" of much of the activity in retail crypto had been revealed by the massive crashes the sector saw last year.

"Since then, Bitcoin has been mostly correlated with expectations of regulatory easements, since still no one can figure out what it is for. Wisely, the Treasury document does not try," he said.

Deep Dive: Tokenisation represents 'paradigm shift' for asset management

He added that "on the upside for the regulator", the implementation of the regulatory system will take some time, by which time "some more lessons about the realities of crypto may have arrived".

"On the downside, if the regulator does not get out of this task, the chances of it succeeding in its mission are low," he concluded. "Not least because if it does try to enforce the requirements that the minister has approved, it can, based on recent experience, expect a letter from the minister asking it not to do so."

The FCA has been contacted for comment.

RECENT NEWS

Building Bridges: Strengthening Investor Confidence Through Enhanced Risk Data In Emerging Markets

In the dynamic landscape of emerging markets, investor confidence plays a pivotal role in driving economic growth and pr... Read more

Reading The Tea Leaves: Analyzing Market Responses To Speculation Of A Fed Interest Rate Increase

As speculation mounts regarding a potential interest rate increase by the Federal Reserve, investors are closely monit... Read more

Tesla's Stock Dilemma: Navigating Through Intensified Global Competition

Tesla, Inc., a bellwether in the electric vehicle (EV) industry, recently announced an ambitious plan to launch more aff... Read more

Evaluating Ukrenergos Standalone Debt Restructuring Versus National Efforts In Ukraine

As Ukraine navigates the complexities of post-war recovery, the debate surrounding the debt restructuring of its state g... Read more

Navigating The Shifting Sands: The Neutral Rate Of Interest In A Rapidly Evolving Economy

In the labyrinth of monetary policy tools, the neutral rate of interest stands out for its pivotal role in stabilizing e... Read more

Indias Stock Market Surge: A Sectoral Deep Dive And The Modi Effect

In the landscape of global finance, few markets have captivated investor interest quite like India's, particularly again... Read more