The Tell: If This Relentless Bid Dries Up, Investors Could Face Gruesome Nightmare

The corporate buyback binge has reached historic proportions, with repurchases by S&P 500 SPX, -0.61% companies in the last three months of 2018 marking the fourth straight quarterly record high.

That’s never happened before.

“Companies continued to spend more of their tax savings on these share repurchases as they boosted earnings through significantly reduced share counts,” S&P Dow Jones Indices analyst Howard Silverblatt explained last month.

Top “buyback queens” in 2018 included Apple AAPL, -0.30% Oracle ORCL, +0.20% Wells Fargo WFC, -1.51% and Microsoft MSFT, -0.54%

But what happens to these shares and the rest of the investment landscape when it stops? Wolf Richter of the Wolf Street blog chewed on the notion of a stock market without its biggest source of demand, and the picture he paints, with the help of Goldman Sachs GS, -0.95% isn’t pretty.

“Too painful to even imagine,” he wrote. “Share buybacks are the relentless bid, buying at any price, buying not to acquire assets at a low price but buying with the specific purpose of pushing up prices.”

Read: ‘How is this possible?’ Analysts puzzle over stock market’s rally amid equity-fund exodus

To get a sense of what the biggest investors have been up to over the past few years of this broad market push, Richter cited this data:

As one can see, the total amount shed comes to about $1.1 trillion. That’s a lot of selling pressure, no doubt, but it’s no match for the massive $2.95 trillion in share buybacks that overpowered it.

“So it all worked out. As investors were selling, companies were buying back their own shares. And markets boomed. But what would happen to stocks in a ‘world without buybacks?’” Richter asked, referencing the Goldman note.

He explained that some members of Congress are now targeting share buybacks and proposing legislation, which apparently has Goldman Sachs concerned that the bull market may be hobbled.

Read: Marco Rubio rolls out his own plan to limit stock buybacks

“It would be a truly unspeakably, nay, unthinkably gruesome nightmare that no politician would want to be responsible for: a world in which stock prices would decline!” Richter said, cheekily.

But in all seriousness, he laid out what would happen in such a scenario. Essentially, demand would evaporate, volatility would rise, earnings-per-share would take a hit and the bull market “would lose the force that powered it.”

In other words, we’d have a market left to fend for itself and embark on its own price discovery. “No one would be ready for it,” Richter said. “This type of world is just too painful to even imagine these days.”

The “relentless bid” didn’t do much for stocks on Tuesday, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA, -0.72% down triple digits, at least check.

Providing critical information for the U.S. trading day. Subscribe to MarketWatch's free Need to Know newsletter. Sign up here.

RECENT NEWS

Why Low Volatility Is Not The Same As Low Risk

Why Low Volatility is Not The Same As Low Risk Some of the worst-performing portfolios in... Read more

Gyrostat May Market Outlook: When The Cost Of Protection Falls - Signals For Portfolio Positioning

This monthly Gyrostat Risk-Managed Market Outlook does not attempt to forecast market direction. It... Read more

The Risk Most Portfolios Do Not Explicitly Manage

Most portfolios are constructed on a simple and widely accepted assumption: that equity risk will be r... Read more

Gyrostat April Outlook: The Changing Cost Of Protection

Signals For Portfolio Construction This monthly Gyrostat Risk-Managed Market Outlook does not attemp... Read more

What Advisers Misunderstand About Protection

Protection is rarely rejected outright. More often, it is misunderstood. Most advisers recognise th... Read more

Gyrostat Market Outlook: Looking Beyond The 30-day Volatility Headlines

This outlook examines how financial markets are pricing risk rather than attempting to forecast market... Read more