Federal Lawsuit Says CFPB Should Collect Data On Business-loan Applications From Women And Minorities

The California Reinvestment Coalition, a coalition of 300 community organizations and small business lenders, filed a federal lawsuit Tuesday against the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to force the agency to start collecting information on business- and commercial-loan applications made by women- and minority-owned small businesses.

The 2010 Dodd Frank Act, a federal law passed in the aftermath of the 2008 market collapse, requires lenders to compile information on applications and actions taken on loan requests. The CFPB is supposed to publish annual reports on the application, under the law. The absence of such data makes it tougher to pinpoint discriminatory lending problems, according to the case.

Put more bluntly: It could allow lenders to engage in “redlining.”

Redlining dates back to the period following the Great Depression. A federal agency at the time, the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation, was tasked with assessing metropolitan areas nationwide for the risk associated with real-estate investments so that lenders could avoid supposedly riskier mortgages from customers, including African American consumers. The 1968 Fair Housing Act outlawed housing discrimination based on race.

But this same practice can apply to lenders too, advocates say. They point to research saying minority-owned businesses have been missing out on capital and credit at fair terms to boost their businesses. In 2013, African American-owned small businesses received 2.3% of the Small Business Administration’s 54,000 loans, the Wall Street Journal reported.

“The Trump administration is actively defying a law specifically designed to expose discriminatory lending practices by financial institutions,” said Anne Harkavy, executive director of the organization bringing the case, Democracy Forward, a legal advocacy group focused on Trump administration actions. If the information is collected and published, at least there will be transparency as to where the problems are occurring, say supporters of the law.

The CFPB didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment on the new lawsuit.

Get a daily roundup of the top reads in personal finance delivered to your inbox. Subscribe to MarketWatch's free Personal Finance Daily newsletter. Sign up here.

RECENT NEWS

Why Low Volatility Is Not The Same As Low Risk

Why Low Volatility is Not The Same As Low Risk Some of the worst-performing portfolios in... Read more

Gyrostat May Market Outlook: When The Cost Of Protection Falls - Signals For Portfolio Positioning

This monthly Gyrostat Risk-Managed Market Outlook does not attempt to forecast market direction. It... Read more

The Risk Most Portfolios Do Not Explicitly Manage

Most portfolios are constructed on a simple and widely accepted assumption: that equity risk will be r... Read more

Gyrostat April Outlook: The Changing Cost Of Protection

Signals For Portfolio Construction This monthly Gyrostat Risk-Managed Market Outlook does not attemp... Read more

What Advisers Misunderstand About Protection

Protection is rarely rejected outright. More often, it is misunderstood. Most advisers recognise th... Read more

Gyrostat Market Outlook: Looking Beyond The 30-day Volatility Headlines

This outlook examines how financial markets are pricing risk rather than attempting to forecast market... Read more