Regulator Sues Product Comparison Site Alleged To Only Compare Products On Which It Earned Commission
Australia’s Securities & Investments Commission has sued a product comparison website that it alleges only considered products from a related company.
The regulator (ASIC) on Tuesday filed a claim [PDF] against an outfit called Choosi Pty Ltd that claims to operate a “team of Choosers” who “help you compare the benefits and prices of a range of products from leading insurers so you can confidently choose cover that suits your needs, budget and lifestyle.”
ASIC is not so sure the Choosers were very choosy.
“Choosi made false or misleading representations to, and engaged in conduct that was liable to mislead, prospective funeral and life insurance customers by making statements that conveyed that Choosi compared funeral and life insurance policies from a range of insurers,” states ASIC’s filing.
“In reality, the Comparison Service was a distribution platform for funeral and life insurance policies issued by Hannover Life Re of Australasia Ltd (Hannover), from whom Choosi received substantial sales commissions,” the filing claims. Furthermore: “The only funeral policies that consumers could compare through Choosi’s Comparison Service were policies issued by Hannover.”
ASIC alleges the policies were all distributed by an outfit called Greenstone Financial Services Pty Ltd, which it described as “a company associated with Choosi.”
- Digital burglars break into the Australian Securities and Investments Commission
- Aussie businesses now have to fess up when they pay off ransomware crims
- Retirement funds reportedly raided after unexplained portal probes and data theft
- DeepSeek rated too dodgy down under: Banned from Australian government devices
Choosi’s comparison service for life insurance was a little better: It compared one policy from another insurer.
The Register sought comment from Choosi but had not received a response at the time of writing. We will update this story if we receive substantive comment.
ASIC Deputy Chair Sarah Court isn’t happy.
“Comparison websites must provide a meaningful comparison service and not simply operate as a sales channel or distribution platform for companies,” she is quoted as saying in a canned statement.
“‘Consumers may have been encouraged to buy a funeral or life insurance policy when a cheaper or more suitable policy might have been available from other insurers that were not assessed,” she added, and urged consumers to choose multiple sources of info when considering purchases. ®
From Chip War To Cloud War: The Next Frontier In Global Tech Competition
The global chip war, characterized by intense competition among nations and corporations for supremacy in semiconductor ... Read more
The High Stakes Of Tech Regulation: Security Risks And Market Dynamics
The influence of tech giants in the global economy continues to grow, raising crucial questions about how to balance sec... Read more
The Tyranny Of Instagram Interiors: Why It's Time To Break Free From Algorithm-Driven Aesthetics
Instagram has become a dominant force in shaping interior design trends, offering a seemingly endless stream of inspirat... Read more
The Data Crunch In AI: Strategies For Sustainability
Exploring solutions to the imminent exhaustion of internet data for AI training.As the artificial intelligence (AI) indu... Read more
Google Abandons Four-Year Effort To Remove Cookies From Chrome Browser
After four years of dedicated effort, Google has decided to abandon its plan to remove third-party cookies from its Chro... Read more
LinkedIn Embraces AI And Gamification To Drive User Engagement And Revenue
In an effort to tackle slowing revenue growth and enhance user engagement, LinkedIn is turning to artificial intelligenc... Read more