Get A Load Of Fancypants No-enemies AMD-Xilinx: 'Large Majority' Of Third Parties 'had No Concerns' About Pair's Hookup
The UK’s competition regulator has finally published its reasons why it has decided not to stand in the way of the $35bn merger between AMD and Xilinx.
After two months of number crunching, market sleuthing and evidence-taking, the Competition and Market’s Authority (CMA) concluded that it “does not believe that it is or may be the case that the merger [between AMD and Xilinx] may be expected to result in an SLC (substantial lessening of competition) within a market or markets in the United Kingdom.”
What's more, the CMA also found little opposition within the industry even going as far as to say that the merger could be "pro-competitive".
- Xilinx snaps up 'accelerated computing' specialist Silexica for its SLX FPGA tool suite
- UK's competition watchdog sniffs around AMD's proposed $35bn all-stock buy of Xilinx
- Remember AMD, Xilinx were merging? Shareholders give thumbs up to $35bn deal
- Xilinx pops a 16-core 64-bit Arm system-on-chip from NXP into its latest FPGA-based 100Gbps smart NIC
- AMD's Lisa Su: Our processor sales are Ryzen faster than the PC market is growing
In October 2020, rumours about the possible tie-up between AMD and Xilinx were confirmed when details of the $35bn all-stock deal were made public.
In April, shareholders gave the merger the green light prompting much corporate back-slapping among execs.
AMD president and CEO Lisa Su, said at the time that Xilinx would bolster AMD's position in high-performance computing. “By combining our world-class engineering team and deep domain expertise, we will create an industry leader with the vision, talent and scale to define the future of high-performance computing.”
But in May, the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) confirmed it planned an investigation to assess whether the merger would lead to a “substantial lessening of competition”.
At the end of June, both the CMA and the European Commission finally reported their decision and waved through the deal. However, full written details of the CMA’s decision were only published today.
In an 11-page statement, the CMA said it considered whether the proposed merger could stifle competition but found no evidence to support the concerns.
Even customers and competitors didn’t have an issue when the competition authority called for comment as part of the consultation phase.
“The large majority of third parties that responded to the CMA’s merger investigation did not express concerns regarding the Merger and some suggested that the Merger would be pro-competitive,” the ruling said.
You can read the full text here. [PDF]
OnlyFans Under The Microscope: Addressing Concerns Over Child Safety
Concerns Over Child SafetyOnlyFans' ResponseRegulatory ActionsCollaborative EffortsFuture DirectionsConclusion Read more
The AI Arms Race: Big Tech's Bid For Dominance In Artificial Intelligence
In the rapidly evolving landscape of technology, the race for dominance in artificial intelligence (AI) has intensified ... Read more
Decoding The Impact Of OpenAI's Sora Video Model On Industries And Jobs
In the realm of artificial intelligence, OpenAI's Sora video model stands out as a groundbreaking innovation, promising ... Read more
Apple Poaches Top Talent From Google To Strengthen AI Team
As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to shape the future of technology, companies are intensifying their efforts to... Read more
Meta's Bold Move: How Chatbots Are Reshaping The Tech Landscape
In a strategic pivot that has sent ripples across the tech industry, Meta has embarked on a bold journey into the realm ... Read more
The Power Of AI: Microsoft's Cloud Sales Reach New Heights
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, Microsoft has emerged as a frontrunner, leveraging the transformative powe... Read more