Banks 'can Do More' To Compensate Fraud Victims

Worried woman with a bank card and phoneImage copyright Getty Images
Image caption Victims can lose thousands of pounds (picture posed by model)

Some fraud victims are missing out on compensation because banks may be treating cases as a tick-box exercise, a review has found.

Victims can lose large sums after being tricked into transferring money to fraudsters they believe are genuine traders or even solicitors.

Some banks have signed an agreement to ensure victims are refunded when they or their bank are not to blame.

A review has found the system is working well, but with some problems.

One area of particular concern is that some victims are not being identified as particularly vulnerable - perhaps because of their age or circumstances - when they call their bank or building society about a fraud.

The Lending Standards Board (LSB), the governing body for the code, said a review of a sample of cases revealed that the failure to spot vulnerable victims, despite evidence being available, could affect compensation claims.

Millions of pounds has been lost to so-called Authorised Push Payment (APP) fraud.

Initially, banks were refusing to refund some victims, as they said the payment had been made on the agreement of the victim.

Later some, but not all, banks signed up to a code to ensure blameless victims were refunded. There remains disagreement over how this should be funded in the long-term.

The review of the code highlighted some concerns, such as a lack of consistency over scam warnings and record keeping, but concluded there was general support from the membership to make it work for victims.

"Where improvements need to be made, we have issued recommendations to individual banks and these are currently being worked through by firms," said LSB chief executive Emma Lovell.

Chris Hemsley, managing director of the Payment Systems Regulator, said: "This report highlights the work that the code's signatories still need to do. An important part of this code is to make sure victims of APP scams are reimbursed if they have done nothing wrong.

"The data we have seen so far suggests the industry isn't achieving the right outcomes at the moment, which is why I called on them to take swift action to do more." 

RECENT NEWS

From Chip War To Cloud War: The Next Frontier In Global Tech Competition

The global chip war, characterized by intense competition among nations and corporations for supremacy in semiconductor ... Read more

The High Stakes Of Tech Regulation: Security Risks And Market Dynamics

The influence of tech giants in the global economy continues to grow, raising crucial questions about how to balance sec... Read more

The Tyranny Of Instagram Interiors: Why It's Time To Break Free From Algorithm-Driven Aesthetics

Instagram has become a dominant force in shaping interior design trends, offering a seemingly endless stream of inspirat... Read more

The Data Crunch In AI: Strategies For Sustainability

Exploring solutions to the imminent exhaustion of internet data for AI training.As the artificial intelligence (AI) indu... Read more

Google Abandons Four-Year Effort To Remove Cookies From Chrome Browser

After four years of dedicated effort, Google has decided to abandon its plan to remove third-party cookies from its Chro... Read more

LinkedIn Embraces AI And Gamification To Drive User Engagement And Revenue

In an effort to tackle slowing revenue growth and enhance user engagement, LinkedIn is turning to artificial intelligenc... Read more