Proportioning Rule Explained: Why It Matters For Withdrawals And Death Benefits

The super system offers tax benefits to help you save for retirement. In return, there are strict rules about when you can make withdrawals and how much tax you, or the people who inherit your super, will pay.

The proportioning rule is one of these tax rules. It means you can’t choose to withdraw only tax-free or taxable amounts. Each withdrawal must reflect the proportions in your account.

Knowing the rule can help you create a more effective recontribution strategy, lowering tax for beneficiaries after you pass away. It will also explain how your own withdrawals are treated, including if you become eligible for the early release of your super (before age 60).

Tax components

Before we cover the proportioning rule, you need to know how your super account is broken up into tax-free and taxable components.

Your super benefit is split into a tax-free component, made up of the contributions segment and crystallised segment, and a taxable component, made up of a taxed element and an untaxed element.

1. Tax-free component

This component includes your non-concessional (after-tax) contributions.

If you were a member of a super fund before July 2007, you may also have other tax-free amounts in your super account.

Within your tax-free component, there are two different elements:

  • Contributions segment: Made up of non-concessional (after-tax) contributions made into your super account after 30 June 2007.
  • Crystallised segment: Made up of amounts that would have been tax free if they had been paid to you before 1 July 2007. Examples are after-tax contributions made before 30 June 2007, capital gains tax (CGT) exempt components and pre-July 1983 components.

2. Taxable component

The taxable component is the remainder of your account balance (i.e. any amount that is not a tax-free component). This comes from concessional (before-tax) contributions and investment earnings, so the value changes regularly.

Within your taxable component, there are two elements:

  • Taxable component – taxed element: Made up of concessional contributions and investment income your super fund has paid tax on.
  • Taxable component – untaxed element: Made up of concessional contributions and investment income your super fund has not paid tax on. Some super funds for government employees are untaxed, and these funds are the main source of untaxed elements. An untaxed element will also be generated if a death benefit, including life insurance, is paid from a fund that claimed tax deductions for insurance premiums. Most funds do claim deductions for premiums, but if you have a self-managed super fund (SMSF), you can choose whether to do so.

You can usually find out the tax components of your account by getting a quote on your fund’s website. If you can’t find it, call your fund and they will work it out for you.

Retirement planning quiz

Retirement planning isn’t the same for everyone.

Take our 2-minute quiz to find out which stage you’re at and what you could focus on next.

START THE QUIZ

The proportioning rule

The proportioning rule prevents you and your beneficiaries from choosing which tax component to withdraw.

Withdrawals and transfers to another super account include the same ratio of tax-free and taxable components as your balance. For example, if your account balance is 70% taxable and 30% tax free, your withdrawals will also be 70% taxable and 30% tax free.

One exception to the proportioning rule is when you request to transfer some of your concessional contributions to your spouse’s super account using contribution splitting. In this case, the transfer comes only from your taxable component because it is drawn from your concessional contributions.

When you start a pension, its proportions are fixed based on the tax components in the original account. For example, if the account used to start the pension was entirely tax-free component, the pension will remain 100% tax-free component until it is closed.

Tax on withdrawals

If you’re eligible to withdraw your super, the tax rate you will pay on your savings depends on your age and the tax components included in your payment.

If you withdraw some of your super before you reach age 60, you will generally pay tax on the taxable components of your super savings unless you qualify for a terminal illness benefit.

On the other hand, if you wait until you reach age 60, your withdrawal will be tax free unless it contains an untaxed element. Untaxed elements come from untaxed super funds, which are uncommon.

When your super is paid after your death, the person who receives it will need to pay tax on the taxable components if they are not your dependant under tax law.

No tax is payable on the tax-free component.

Because the proportioning rule requires tax components to be paid in proportion, you can’t avoid tax by choosing to withdraw only the tax-free component. Your payment will include both tax-free and taxable amounts, in the same ratio as your account balance.

How the proportioning rule affects super strategies

The proportioning rule is important for two common strategies:

  1. The recontribution strategy to reduce tax for future beneficiaries
  2. A rollover strategy to lock in a higher tax-free proportion after suffering a permanent disability.

The recontribution strategy is used to convert taxable components into a tax-free component by withdrawing money from super and using the funds to make non-concessional (after-tax) contributions. Using a separate account for contributions avoids tax components mixing in one account, which would require future withdrawals to be paid proportionally from each component. This is important in two types of recontribution strategy:

  • The dual pension strategy: The new account created from the contributions is used to start a tax-free pension that can be left to a non-dependant beneficiary, ensuring their benefit is tax free. Your remaining super, including taxable components, can be used for a second pension. Alternatively, withdrawals from the tax-free pension can be kept to the minimum while all additional spending needs are taken from the taxable pension.
  • A multi-stage recontribution strategy: A multi-stage strategy involves more than one withdrawal and recontribution, often over a period of many years. It can be used when your account balance is too high to be entirely converted to tax-free proportion with one withdrawal and recontribution because of the non-concessional contribution cap.

Adding contributions to a separate account in a multi-stage strategy means future withdrawals can be taken from the account that still contains a high taxable proportion. The withdrawal and following contribution will convert more taxable proportion to tax-free than would be possible using one account. The effect occurs because if the entire balance was in one account, the second and subsequent withdrawals would include more tax-free component thanks to the proportioning rule.

The rollover strategy for permanent disability benefits takes advantage of an increase to the tax-free component that happens when you take a permanent incapacity or total and permanent disability payment from super. The tax-free uplift applies to lump sum payments, including a rollover (transfer) to a new super fund.

Rolling over a disability benefit means the ‘tax-free uplift’ is calculated and included in the rollover. The strategy can be helpful if you will not cash your entire balance immediately. It means future withdrawals from your new fund contain the increased tax-free amount. Without a rollover, you may need to provide more medical certificates to your fund to qualify for the uplift when you request another withdrawal.

Need to know: How starting a pension can help

In both the rollover and recontribution strategies, starting a pension plays a key role.

Because the tax proportions of pensions are fixed, they can be used to lock in a high tax-free proportion.

For example, in a multi-stage recontribution strategy, both the new account holding only the tax-free proportion and the old account that still has taxable amounts could be used to start pensions. The pension created from the new account will remain 100% tax free until it is closed. The other can be used for future withdrawals that will be used to fund contributions. If pensions were not started, the accounts would generate an increasing taxable proportion over time as investment growth was added.

Similarly, starting a pension after rolling over a disability benefit will lock in the tax-free proportion and prevent it from being diluted by future investment returns.

Importantly, money in a super pension is assessable in Centrelink means tests and could reduce your entitlement to Age Pension, Disability Support Pension and other benefits. Savings in a super accumulation account are not assessed until you turn 67.

If you started a pension before deciding to use a recontribution strategy, don’t despair. Simple account-based pensions allow lump sum withdrawals, so you can still withdraw and contribute to a new accumulation account. That new account can then be used to start a new (second) pension.

Learn more about using a recontribution strategy when you have an existing pension, with examples of how to add to your super pension.

Always seek personalised advice if needed.

Case study: Lump sum death benefit

Zhen died and her remaining super balance was paid in equal shares to her daughter Jenny and her son Kevin.

Jenny was aged 40 at the time of her mother’s death and did not rely on her for financial support. Kevin was 35 and had Down’s syndrome. He had always lived with Zhen and been supported by her.

Based on the circumstances, Jenny is not a dependant for tax purposes, but Kevin is.

Zhen’s balance was held in a pension made up of a 60% tax-free component and 40% taxable component. She completed a recontribution strategy when she retired to create the large tax-free component but did not keep it in a separate account.

Both Kevin and Jenny receive a benefit of $200,000 each, made up of a 60% tax-free and 40% taxable component (taxed element).

Kevin pays no tax because he is a dependant.

Jenny pays tax on the taxable component at the rate of 15% plus Medicare levy (2%). The taxable component is $80,000 (40% x $200,000), so the tax is $13,600 (17% x $80,000). If the benefit was instead paid into Zhen’s estate before being distributed to Jenny, no Medicare levy would apply.

If Zhen had instead used a separate account for her contribution and used it to start a pension that was 100% tax free, she could have chosen to leave the tax-free pension to Jenny and the taxable pension to Kevin (a dual pension strategy). Then, neither child would pay tax on the lump sum death benefits they received. If the tax-free pension was larger, a portion of it could be left to Kevin or he could be nominated to receive other assets in Zhen’s will to compensate for the inequality.

Learn more about the dual pension strategy.

Zhen’s scenario with a single pension versus two pensions

Zhen’s 0,000 pension is 60% tax-free and 40% taxable. Split equally from one pension, Jenny pays ,600 tax on her ,000 taxable share and Kevin, a dependant, pays none. With separate tax-free and taxable pensions, Jenny receives the tax-free pension and Kevin the taxable one, and neither pays tax.

Case study: Pension withdrawals

Aisha is retiring from the workforce. She plans to start a monthly pension using her super balance.

After contacting her super fund, Aisha finds her account contains 25% tax-free component and 75% taxable component (taxed element).

If Aisha’s monthly pension is $2,000, each payment will be made up of $500 tax-free component and $1,500 taxable component.

These proportions apply to all benefits paid from the pension to Aisha and to any death benefits paid to her beneficiaries, because the tax-free and taxable proportions are locked in on the date the pension commences.

She could use a recontribution strategy (see above) to improve the tax-free proportion before starting a pension if she wishes.

Case study: Lump sum withdrawal

Aldo is 40 years of age and taking a lump sum of $20,000 from his super that has been released on compassionate grounds for necessary medical expenses.

When he checks with his super fund, Aldo finds his total super balance is $400,000 and the components are:

  • Tax-free component: $100,000
  • Taxable component (taxed element): $300,000

This means 25% of Aldo’s super benefit is tax free and the remaining 75% is the taxable component.

The fund will pay Aldo enough to ensure the benefit he receives after tax is deducted is equal to $20,000.

The fund’s software calculates that the required dollar figure is $23,952.10.

The tax components of the withdrawal are calculated as follows:

Tax-free component: $23,952.10 x 25% = $5,988.03

Taxable component: $23,952.10 – $5,988.03 = $17,964.07

Because Aldo is under 60, he will pay tax of 22% including the Medicare levy on the taxable (taxed) component. This results in total tax of $3,952.10 on his benefit ($17,964.07 x 22%).

The after-tax amount paid to Aldo is $20,000 (total benefit of $23,952.10 – $3,952.10 tax on the taxable component).

The proportioning rule forces Aldo to withdraw 75% of his payment from the taxable component, even though his tax-free component was large enough to cover his entire withdrawal.

The following questions were raised by members in our Q&A webinars.

Q: When a superannuation fund enters the pension phase, all investment earnings become tax free on both the taxable and tax-free components. Are these tax-free earnings allocated to the tax-free and taxable components in the same proportion as the existing balance, or are all tax-free earnings added solely to the tax-free component?

Q: As my self-managed super fund (SMSF) balance is about double the TBC how does proportioning of the income work in the portions that are separated into Pension phase and Accumulation phase? I am over 60. If I made a lump sum withdrawal from the accumulation portion does re-proportioning take place ?

Warning

The rules around tax and super benefits are complex. Before implementing any strategy you should always seek appropriate advice from an independent licensed financial planner or tax accountant professionally qualified in this area.

You need to be very careful not to exceed the relevant super contributions caps and to confirm that you are eligible to contribute the money back into the super system before making a withdrawal.

The information in this article is of a general nature only and cannot be considered financial advice.

Get more guides like this with a free account

Get independent guidance and practical tools to help you make

better super and retirement decisions.

Create free account

IMPORTANT: All information on SuperGuide is general in nature only and does not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider whether any information on SuperGuide is appropriate to you before acting on it. If SuperGuide refers to a financial product you should obtain the relevant product disclosure statement (PDS) or seek personal financial advice before making any investment decisions. Comments provided by readers that may include information relating to tax, superannuation or other rules cannot be relied upon as advice. SuperGuide does not verify the information provided within comments from readers. Learn more

© Copyright SuperGuide 2008-26. Copyright for this guide belongs to SuperGuide Pty Ltd, and cannot be reproduced without express and specific consent. Learn more

RECENT NEWS

Retirement Portfolio Construction

Pairing Growth with Retirement Portfolio Resilience Executive summary Traditional portfolio construction has general... Read more

October Retirement Portfolio Resilience Assessment

Markets stabl Read more

Australias Superannuation Market Comes Of Age

There are not many retirement systems in the world that have become large enough to shape capital markets, public policy... Read more

Sequence Of Returns Risk And Retirement Portfolio Resilience

Sequence of Returns Risk and Retirement Portfolio Resilience Why retirement portfolio construction ... Read more

Dynamic Hedging And Retirement Portfolio Resilience

Dynamic Hedging and Retirement Portfolio Resilience Why an established institutional discipline may ... Read more