The Wall Street Journal: Major Stakeholders Criticize SoftBank Over Bad Investments

SoftBank Group Corp.’s biggest investors are putting pressure on the tech conglomerate over its governance and for a string of bad investments in its $100 billion investment fund.

Investors including Capital Group, hedge fund Tiger Global Management LLC and Southeastern Asset Management Inc. have privately criticized the company over losses in the Vision Fund in recent weeks, people familiar with the matter said.

The investors have also criticized SoftBank’s 9984, +0.93%   plan to help raise cash for a second Vision Fund by lending billions of dollars to its own executives, the people said. The Wall Street Journal reported in August that SoftBank planned to lend up to $20 billion to Chief Executive Masayoshi Son and other top executives to invest in the fund, helping a fundraising effort that has stalled.

In conversations with SoftBank executives and investor-relations staff, those shareholders and others — including AllianceBernstein LP and Odey Asset Management — have criticized the loans as risky and said they could create conflicts of interest between the executives and investors. In addition to Son, the borrowers include several SoftBank board members who also hold senior roles at the Vision Fund. The company hasn’t disclosed details of the arrangement to investors.

Capital Group — one of SoftBank’s largest shareholders with a 2% stake as of Sept. 30 — and AllianceBernstein AB, -0.55%   have told SoftBank executives that Son shouldn’t participate in the loan program, people familiar with the matter said. Tiger Global complained about corporate governance rather than SoftBank’s investments, a Tiger Global spokeswoman said. Some investors shared their concerns during meetings with Son and Navneet Govil, the Vision Fund’s finance chief, at the company’s quarterly earnings presentation last month, some of the people said.

An expanded version of this report appears on WSJ.com.

Also popular on WSJ.com.

Corporate executives try to assess potential impact of tax change proposals.

Silicon Valley adjusts to new reality as $100 billion evaporates.

RECENT NEWS

Gyrostat May Market Outlook: When The Cost Of Protection Falls - Signals For Portfolio Positioning

This monthly Gyrostat Risk-Managed Market Outlook does not attempt to forecast market direction. It... Read more

The Risk Most Portfolios Do Not Explicitly Manage

Most portfolios are constructed on a simple and widely accepted assumption: that equity risk will be r... Read more

Gyrostat April Outlook: The Changing Cost Of Protection

Signals For Portfolio Construction This monthly Gyrostat Risk-Managed Market Outlook does not attemp... Read more

What Advisers Misunderstand About Protection

Protection is rarely rejected outright. More often, it is misunderstood. Most advisers recognise th... Read more

Gyrostat Market Outlook: Looking Beyond The 30-day Volatility Headlines

This outlook examines how financial markets are pricing risk rather than attempting to forecast market... Read more

Gyrostat Capital Management: The Hidden Assumption In Most Portfolios - Stability

Markets do not usually fail portfolios. Assumptions do. Most portfolios are built with car... Read more