T. Bailey's Askew: Investors 'too Blasé' About Non-sterling Exposure
Peter Askew, co-manager of the T. Bailey Dynamic and T. Bailey Growth funds, has been increasing both funds' sterling weighting in recent months despite a lack of foreign exchange rate volatility, following a period where the currency has been unloved.
In a note to investors back in December 2019, the manager explained that as sterling-based investors, T. Bailey Asset Management was "conscious" of the need to provide outcomes in sterling.
He added in the same note that in the £114m Dynamic fund, which has an objective of UK inflation plus 3%, "any non-sterling position should either diversify the portfolio or be expected to add to the return outcome without undue risk".
Ex-Aberdeen Standard distribution head Lowe joins T. Bailey AM
Speaking to Investment Week, Askew said: "The point I was making in that note was a lot of people have become somewhat blasé about the amount of non-sterling exposure they have.
"While foreign exchange rates last year had the lowest amount of volatility for some years, that may not be the case this year or going forward."
He added: "Last year was different in terms of volatility of foreign exchange, but over the years that basically becomes a currency fund.
"The key driver of returns is not what you are investing in in terms of the assets, it is what happens to sterling versus other risk currencies - that is what we are trying to point out."
Askew confirmed that in the Dynamic fund, which he co-manages with Elliot Farley, they had increased the sterling weighting to over 80%.
"Dynamic is intended to be a complete solution and it is particularly favoured by a lot of smaller investors - so people who have been almost orphaned by the threshold cost to advisers of increasing regulation," he added.
The latest sales figures published by the Investment Association showed mixed asset was the best-selling asset class in November 2019, clocking up net retail sales
of £1.3bn.
Askew said the increasing popularity of multi-asset funds was "understandable" and that flows had been strongest for T. Bailey's Dynamic fund.
"I think it is harder for individual investors or advisers to make that call, particularly where assets are currently priced," he explained.
What's in a name? The dangers of 'the bond labelling problem'
"It takes one big decision - obviously it is a big decision, asset allocation - out of the equation and gives it to people who spend their life doing that as a job."
The T. Bailey Dynamic fund has returned 29.4% over five years to 27 January 2020, compared to the Mixed Investment 20-60% Shares sector average of 25.1%, according to FE fundinfo.
Askew said performance was down to "focusing on delivering an outcome that makes sense to the end investor".
What A Rising VIX Means For Pension Funds
Wall Street’s latest selloff has moved beyond a technology-sector wobble and become a broad market event. The Nasdaq C... Read more
Behaviour Cannot Fix A Portfolio Construction Flaw
A Retiree Shouldn't Be Asked to Behave Their Way Out of a Portfolio Construction Problem Why behavioural coaching shoul... Read more
Behavioural & Retirement Portfolio Resilience
Behavioural Survivability and Retirement Portfolio Resilience Why the lived experience of market recovery matters as mu... Read more
Australia's Rate Rise Bites: Highest In 15 Years
The Reserve Bank of Australia has lifted interest rates to their highest level since 2011, and its governor admits the w... Read more
October Retirement Portfolio Resilience Assessment
Markets stabl Read more
Gyrostat September Retirement Portfolio Resilience Assessment
September Retirement Portfolio Resilience Assessment Markets have fallen. The price of risk has risen. ... Read more