ESG Factors Decline As Criteria For Selection Of MPS Provider

The survey, which interviewed 126 discretionary fund managers and 169 investment advisers, found that compared to 2020, ESG availability and suitability have dropped by 13 percentage points and three percentage points, respectively.

Meanwhile, the adviser back-office system was one of the least selected by respondents, with 16% saying it was a key feature.

Tatton AM assets jump by nearly 20% on MPS demand

RSMR found that the most often cited key features of a good MPS provider cited was performance (83%), followed by charges (79%) and availability on platforms (69%).

It also found that advisers are placing significantly more emphasis on an established brand and reputation in an increasingly competitive market. This was highlighted by 31% of respondents, a rise from 23% in 2022.

RECENT NEWS

Gyrostat Capital Management: The Missing Allocation In Retirement Portfolio Construction?

For decades, retirement portfolios have largely been constructed using combinations of growth assets a... Read more

When The Gate Comes Down

A Stress Test Rather Than a ScandalApollo Debt Solutions is not a blow-up story. It is something arguably more instructi... Read more

What If The Investment Industry Is Benchmarking The Wrong Things?

  Investment management is built around benchmarking.  Fund managers compare themselves a... Read more

SpaceX Is Looks To Make History

The Biggest Bet in Wall Street History: SpaceX's $1.78 Trillion IPOThere are moments in financial history that stop you ... Read more

Gyrostat June Market Outlook: When Low Volatility Conceals Structural Risk

This monthly Gyrostat Risk-Managed Market Outlook does not attempt to forecast market direc... Read more

Why Low Volatility Is Not The Same As Low Risk

Why Low Volatility is Not The Same As Low Risk Some of the worst-performing portfolios in... Read more