Capitol Report: Trumps Regulatory Rollback For The U.S. Economy Is A Dud — So Far

A slew of regulations proposed by former President Barack Obama have been killed off by Republicans, but it’s hard to find clear benefits for the economy.

President Trump has eliminated or rolled back large chunks of regulation with businesses cheering the White House on, but it’s hard to find evidence it’s been a big help to the economy after one year.

So say the researchers at Goldman Sachs. Economists at the Wall Street powerhouse looked for proof of deregulatory benefits and said the evidence so far is thin.

“Deregulation has had a limited impact on the economy to date,” economists wrote in a report.

Also Read: Inflation fears haunt Wall Street, but investors might having a bad dream

Trump and Republicans have touted their success in cutting regulations and making it easier for companies to get permission for projects, saying it’s helping the economy to grow faster.

Congress, for example, used a little known law that had only been used once before to kill off a set of pending Obama-era rules. And the White House eased the regulatory crunch on the coal industry and approved the Keystone pipeline that had been blocked for years by President Obama.

Goldman examined three areas for signs of evidence to back up Republican claims: What the companies tell investors about regulatory costs; the effect of deregulation on stock prices; and the relationship between deregulation and hiring and investment.

Goldman said it couldn’t find tangible benefits in any of those three areas.

How come?

For one thing, the estimated cost of regulation on the economy “are not that high” relative to other business expenses, the firm said. Regulatory changes are also difficult to enact and slow to put into effect. And states and localities are arguably more heavy-handed with regulation than the federal government.

Also Read: Businesses upbeat on Trump tax cuts but many are still uncertain

It’s possible the upside for the economy will emerge over time, Goldman Sachs said, but it would be hard to tell since “the effects of deregulation on the economy are often vague and difficult to estimate.”

The most likely beneficiaries are financial firms — banks and brokerages — if Republicans follow through on plans to loosen restrictions imposed after the 2008 financial meltdown.

“Financial deregulation appears more likely to result in meaningful changes and is likely to be the most important items on the regulatory agenda for 2018 and beyond,” Goldman Sachs said.

RECENT NEWS

UK High Street Banks Rake In £9.2 Billion In Interest On BoE Reserves: A Closer Look

In the intricate world of finance, where numbers often tell compelling stories, one recent figure stands out: £9.2 bill... Read more

Powell's Pledge: Federal Reserve Chair Signals Prolonged Period Of Higher Rates

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell's recent statements have stirred significant interest in financial markets, particul... Read more

European Funds Body Throws Support Behind French Capital Markets Union: Implications For Brexit-Era Finance

In a significant development for European finance, a European funds body recently threw its support behind the French ca... Read more

Federal Reserve's Rate Decision: Navigating Economic Uncertainty

The recent decision by the Federal Reserve to adjust interest rates has sparked significant interest and speculation amo... Read more

Building Bridges: Strengthening Investor Confidence Through Enhanced Risk Data In Emerging Markets

In the dynamic landscape of emerging markets, investor confidence plays a pivotal role in driving economic growth and pr... Read more

Reading The Tea Leaves: Analyzing Market Responses To Speculation Of A Fed Interest Rate Increase

As speculation mounts regarding a potential interest rate increase by the Federal Reserve, investors are closely monit... Read more