MetLife On The Hook For $10 Million SEC Fine

MetLife on the hook for $10 million SEC fine

MetLife has a $10 million score to settle after the US Securities and Exchange Commission alleged that the company violated key provisions of the federal securities laws.

The issue centers on how the insurer accounted for reserves associated with its annuities businesses – MetLife would acquire the assets of employer pension plans and convert them into group annuity contracts, according to Reuters.

For close to three decades, MetLife had a policy of assuming customers had passed away or couldn’t be found if they didn’t respond to two mailings that were made five and a half years apart, according to an SEC statement made on Wednesday. This practice – called pension risk transfer – allegedly put more profits in MetLife’s pocket since the firm could then free up money that was put aside to cover claims.

MetLife hasn’t admitted to or denied the SEC’s allegations, but has determined that the policy was insufficient to justify the release of reserves. In response to this error, MetLife boosted reserves by $510 million in 2017, stated the SEC, which also found that the insurer overstated its reserves and understated income when it came to the variable annuity business. MetLife reduced reserves by $896 million to correct for that error in 2017.

“MetLife’s insufficient internal controls caused longstanding accounting errors,” said Marc Berger, head of the SEC’s New York office.

“Our focus since we self-identified these issues has been to improve our processes to deliver better service to our customers,” MetLife said in an emailed statement to Bloomberg. “We successfully remediated both material weaknesses associated with this settlement as of December 2018.”

In a separate case, the insurer agreed to pony up $1 million to Massachusetts to address claims that it made misleading statements to investors in failing to pay pension benefits to thousands of retirees. As if that wasn’t enough hot water, at the start of 2019, MetLife also agreed to a $19.75-million penalty to New York state’s insurance regulator for that failure.

RECENT NEWS

People Power: Building The Future Of Insurance One Career At A Time

The insurance industry is at a pivotal point. As emerging technologies reshape underwriting, claims processing, and cust... Read more

Private Equity's Great Divide: Is The Future Insurance-Funded Or Fee-Driven?

A fundamental shift is taking place at the top of the private equity industry. While firms like Blackstone remain commit... Read more

Japan's Next Battleground: The Insurance Sector Under Activist Pressure

Farallon’s push at T&D Holdings marks a shift in focus for activist capital targeting Japan’s untapped insurance... Read more

Cover And Conflict: Tensions Rise Between Insurers And Litigation Funders

Burford’s clash with Chubb signals a deeper rift in the legal-financial ecosystem A high-profile dispute between li... Read more

Underwater And Uninsured: How Climate Risk Is Reshaping The US Mortgage Market

As climate change intensifies, its effects are no longer confined to coastlines or news reports on extreme weather. In t... Read more

When The Raters Get Rated: What The Fitch–Kroll Feud Says About Oversight And Accountability

In a rare and unusually public confrontation between two of America’s credit rating agencies, a recent feud between Fi... Read more