Despite Trade Tensions, Treasury Declines To Label China A Currency Manipulator

By

Senior economics reporter

Treasury said that it was worried about the nonmarket direction of China’s economic development.

Despite rising trade friction with China, the Treasury Department again declined to label China a currency manipulator.

In a report released Friday, the department said that it remained worried about “the increasingly nonmarket direction of China’s economic development.” This posed a “growing risk” to China’s trading partners and the long-term global growth outlook.

The U.S. and China are threatening to place tariffs on each other’s goods. It may be weeks or months before it becomes clear if either side blinks.

Read: Game of chicken: Trump adopts high-risk strategy in fight with China over unfair trade

The report is where Washington could have formally cited China for manipulating its currency lower to boost exports. The label could have added to an already worsening trade confrontation.

The report said that over 2017, the Chinese yuan “generally moved against the dollar in a direction that should, all else equal, help reduce China’s trade surplus with the U.S.” The agency said China’s goods trade surplus rose to $375 billion over the year, an increase of $28 billion over 2016.

India was added in this report to the Treasury monitoring list along with Japan, South Korea, Germany,and Switzerland. Countries that are under scrutiny for practices including a trade surplus in excess of $20 billion, a current account surplus larger than 3% of GDP and persistent intervention in currency markets in excess of 2% of an economy’s GDP. No countries broke all three of those actions, Treasury said.

The department cited India’s purchases of $56 billion of foreign exchange over the year, equivalent to 2.2% of GDP. Notwithstanding the increase in intervention,the rupee appreciated by more than 6% against the dollar. India had a goods trade surplus totaling $23 billion in 2017.

In 2017, the ICE U.S. dollar index DXY, -0.45%   posted its weakest calendar-year performance since 2003, down almost 10%.

Some of the dollar’s weakness in 2017 was due to the surprising growth overseas, said St. Louis Fed President James Bullard on Friday.

RECENT NEWS

When The Gate Comes Down

A Stress Test Rather Than a ScandalApollo Debt Solutions is not a blow-up story. It is something arguably more instructi... Read more

What If The Investment Industry Is Benchmarking The Wrong Things?

  Investment management is built around benchmarking.  Fund managers compare themselves a... Read more

SpaceX Is Looks To Make History

The Biggest Bet in Wall Street History: SpaceX's $1.78 Trillion IPOThere are moments in financial history that stop you ... Read more

Gyrostat June Market Outlook: When Low Volatility Conceals Structural Risk

This monthly Gyrostat Risk-Managed Market Outlook does not attempt to forecast market direc... Read more

Why Low Volatility Is Not The Same As Low Risk

Why Low Volatility is Not The Same As Low Risk Some of the worst-performing portfolios in... Read more

Gyrostat May Market Outlook: When The Cost Of Protection Falls - Signals For Portfolio Positioning

This monthly Gyrostat Risk-Managed Market Outlook does not attempt to forecast market direction. It... Read more