Discover top fintech news and events!
Subscribe to FinTech Weekly's newsletter
Read by executives at JP Morgan, Coinbase, Blackrock, Klarna and more
A few years ago, “instant payments” meant the app did not crash.
The confirmation screen appeared immediately. The money arrived later. Sometimes hours later. Sometimes the next day. Everyone called it instant because the notification was fast, even if settlement was not.
That polite fiction is breaking down.
Finance is no longer primarily human initiated. Increasingly, it is software driven. Treasury systems rebalance automatically. Trading algorithms move capital across venues in milliseconds. Payment flows trigger off APIs, not office hours. Stablecoins settle billions of dollars on weekends. Markets are edging toward 24 hour operation.
The financial system we rely on was not built for this.
The problem is not payments. It is settlement.
In legacy finance, when you initiate a transaction, money does not move first. An instruction moves. That instruction enters a maze of intermediaries handling authorization, compliance checks, risk management, clearing, and reconciliation. Settlement happens later, often in batches, often inside fixed windows.
The gap between instruction and finality was once manageable. Today it is a structural weakness.
If a treasury desk moves fifty million dollars across jurisdictions, that capital can sit in limbo for hours while ledgers reconcile. During that time, it cannot be deployed. It cannot earn yield. It still carries counterparty exposure. Multiply that across institutions and across days, and the cost is not theoretical. It is systemic liquidity drag.
Now introduce automation.
Software agents do not “understand” pending. They operate on conditions. If liquidity is available and price thresholds are met, execute. If collateral ratios breach, rebalance. If yield differentials open, allocate.
For that world to function safely, execution and settlement must be the same event.
In automated finance, pending is not a status. It is risk.
Most existing rails were built on the opposite assumption. They separate messaging from finality. They externalize compliance. They rely on reconciliation cycles and operating hours. They assume a human can intervene when something breaks.
That architecture strains under continuous, global, machine initiated activity.
This is why stablecoins matter. Not because they are novel assets. Because they collapse execution and settlement into a single step. Value moves and finalizes on a shared ledger, twenty four hours a day, across borders. There is no clearing window. There is no batch file waiting for end of day processing.
That is not a cosmetic upgrade. It is a different settlement model.
The same logic is spreading to tokenized deposits, treasuries, and other real world assets. When financial instruments live on a programmable ledger, transfer rules can be enforced at the asset level. Compliance is embedded. Settlement is atomic. Reconciliation shrinks. Counterparty exposure compresses.
For decades, finance has optimized messaging layers. Faster cards. Faster wires. Faster notifications.
But speeding up the message does not eliminate settlement risk. It just accelerates the accumulation of obligations inside opaque systems.
The real bottleneck is finality.
Markets are moving toward continuous trading. Interoperable liquidity. Autonomous capital allocation. AI systems will not tolerate infrastructure designed around business hours and manual exception handling. They will route around it.
Institutions understand this. The shift toward tokenization, stablecoins, and programmable assets is not an ideological pivot. It is an operational one. They are looking for a settlement substrate that matches how capital now moves.
That requires infrastructure where execution, settlement, and rules live together.
The Polygon Open Money Stack is built around that premise. It integrates fiat connectivity, stablecoin infrastructure, tokenized assets, compliance frameworks, and cross chain interoperability into a unified settlement environment. The objective is straightforward. Money should move instantly, settle atomically, and remain usable the moment it arrives.
This is not about replacing banks. Banks will continue to custody assets, manage risk, serve clients, and satisfy regulators. Payment providers will continue to interface with consumers and businesses. Regulators will continue to set guardrails.
What changes is the layer beneath them.
Instead of coordinating across fragmented ledgers with delayed finality, institutions can operate on a shared programmable settlement layer. Instead of enforcing rules beside the rails, they can embed them within the asset. Instead of reconciling after the fact, they can transact with deterministic outcomes.
The transition will not be loud. It will be infrastructural. Gradual, then sudden.
First stablecoins settle treasury flows on weekends. Then tokenized collateral moves in real time. Then software agents manage liquidity continuously. At each step, the gap between legacy settlement and programmable finality becomes harder to justify.
Finance does not modernize because it is fashionable. It modernizes because the old system stops scaling.
We are approaching that threshold.
When markets run twenty four hours a day, capital is allocated by software, and liquidity moves globally by default, a settlement layer designed for a paper era becomes a constraint.
Money has already become programmable.
Settlement has to catch up.
About the author
Marc Boiron serves as the CEO of Polygon Labs, a blockchain payments company building compliant financial infrastructure with the mission to move all money onchain. Polygon Labs develops the Open Money Stack, an open, integrated stack of services that makes it easy for any institution to move money onchain, using various infrastructure, including Polygon chain, wallet, interoperability and on- and off-ramp infrastructure.