All Hong Kong QROPS Delisted By HMRC

Published:  6 Dec at 6 PM
Want to get involved?

Become a

Featured Expat

and take our interview.

Become a

Local Expert

and contribute articles.

Get in

touch

today!

British expats living in China as well as Chinese nationals with UK pension rights cannot now transfer their pension savings to a Hong Kong QROPS.

In total, all 19 Hong Kong-based QROPS have been delisted by HMRC and are no longer included in the authority’s list of approved schemes. For expats living in China and planning to transfer their funds to a QROPS, the delisting means they no longer qualify for an exemption and must either pay a 25 per cent transfer tax or switch the fund to a UK-based SIPP self invested personal pension.

As is usual, HMRC has given no reason for the deletion of the 19 Hong Kong QROPS, and the firms affected by the decision have made no comment as yet regarding their products’ loss of status. Hong Kong based QROPS have been established in the offshore pensions marketplace since the start of the QROPS scheme in 2006, averaging between 10 and 26 products over the past 11 years. In April this year, 22 schemes were registered, with one deleted during the month and two more taken down in October, again with no explanation from HRMC.

The Hong Kong financial market, including its QROPS, has frequently borne the brunt of speculation as regards tax avoidance and general breaking of rules, but no individual scheme has been singled out by HMRC for supposedly breaching its pension laws. Following the closure of the Hong Kong QROPS, there are now 29 offshore financial jurisdictions offering the pensions, with 16 located within the European Economic Area (EEA), and the rest set outside the European mainland.

Although no reports have come in as yet regarding the status of those whose Hong Kong QROPS have been deleted, online examples include the plight of 100 investors in the 2012-delisted Singapore-based Panthera ROSIIP scheme. After being delisted, HMRC considered their original transfers ‘unauthorised’ and billed them for up to 55 per cent of the transfer’s value as the scheme had lost its qualifying status. Some charges amounted to more than the current total value of pension pots.

The investors fought back using a group litigation order, with the final judgement in 2013 proving humiliating for HMRC as it was forced to recall the tax bills and pay investors’ legal costs.



Comments » No published comments just yet for this article...

Feel free to have your say on this item. Go on... be the first!

Tell us Your Thoughts On This Piece:

RECENT NEWS

Cross Us Off The List: Why Locals In This Tiny European Village Want Its UNESCO Status Removed

Some residents believe they would be better off if the village was removed from the prestigious list. Read more

'Our Main Export Is Joy': Why Europeans Are Flocking To Brazil In Record Numbers

Brazil closed 2025 as the world's fastest-growing international destination, driven by new air routes and a growing push... Read more

Spain Plans To Focus On Quality Over Quantity As Tourist Numbers Hit Record High

Spain has struggled to balance tourism with local life, as residents complain of housing shortages and rising costs. Read more

EU's New Entry/Exit System Has Had A Shaky Start. Heres What Travellers Need To Know

Travellers can expect information campaigns and awareness-raising activities at border crossing points. Read more

Rome Tourists Have To Pay To Get Up Close To The Trevi Fountain From Today

Authorities say the goal is to stop tourists from "eating ice cream or pizza on a monument that deserves the proper resp... Read more

'Stigmatised Territory': Why Tourists Have Abandoned Rio's 'posh' Attractions For These Favelas

The "often-stigmatised territories" of Rio de Janeiro are experiencing a tourist boom, and it's pumping cash into low-in... Read more