Hyperliquid Pushes Back On FUD Over Revenue Vs. Trader Focus

Hyperliquid founder Jeff Yan has addressed criticism, suggesting the platform prioritizes protocol revenue over trader interests.

Summary

  • Jeff Yan says ADL saved traders millions during October 10 market crash.
  • Hyperliquid passed profits to users instead of maximizing protocol revenue.
  • Founder contrasts DeFi onchain transparency with CEX liquidation secrecy.

He also defended the exchange’s auto-deleveraging mechanism during the October 10 market crash.

Yan stated that ADL actions made users “hundreds of millions of dollars” by closing profitable short positions at favorable prices, while the platform’s liquidity pool passed on potential profits to users rather than maximizing its own returns.

The defense comes amid scrutiny of how decentralized perpetual exchanges handle liquidations during volatile market conditions.

Yan emphasized that if more positions had been backstop liquidated, HLP could have made hundreds of millions more in profit, but would have faced irresponsible risk exposure.

He also called the ADL approach a “win-win” that decreased platform exposure.

ADL formula prioritizes simplicity and user understanding

Yan explained that Hyperliquid’s ADL queue follows a similar formula to most centralized exchanges and incorporates both leverage used and unrealized profit on open positions.

Community feedback suggested more sophisticated ADL mechanisms, such as partially offsetting long and short positions in historically correlated assets.

Yan noted that increased complexity could improve performance but questioned whether the benefits merit the added complications.

The founder stated that research is ongoing into whether substantial improvements justify more complex formulas. However, he emphasized that no other major venues use more advanced logic for ADL queues.

Onchain transparency distinguishes DeFi from CEX practices

On October 13, Yan addressed the overall concerns about liquidation reporting by contrasting Hyperliquid’s fully on-chain operations with centralized exchange practices.

Yan called out centralized exchanges for underreporting user liquidations and cited Binance documentation showing that even when thousands of liquidation orders occur in the same second, only one gets reported.

This could be a 100x underreporting under certain conditions when liquidations happen in bursts.

Yan expressed hope that the industry will recognize transparency and neutrality as important features of the new financial system. He also encouraged other platforms to follow Hyperliquid’s approach to verifiable on-chain operations.

RECENT NEWS

Crypto Treasuries Chase A New Kind Of Capital

There is a peculiar irony at the heart of the crypto treasury movement. Companies that staked their futures on digital a... Read more

What Strategy's Bitcoin Sale Really Tells Us

There is a moment in every bull run when the narrative starts to fray. Not with a crash, not with a scandal, but with so... Read more

The Clock Is Ticking On UK Stablecoins

The world is not waiting for Britain to make up its mind. While the United States and the European Union have spent the ... Read more

From Cypherpunk To Citadel

How Crypto Moved from the Wild West to the Mainstream Financial SystemA long-form analysis of Bitcoin's journey from fri... Read more

Tether Plots Global Expansion

Stablecoin leader seeks to transform itself from crypto plumbing provider into a broad “freedom tech” conglomerateTe... Read more

World Liberty Seeks Federal Trust Charter

World Liberty Financial, the crypto venture backed by the Trump family, has applied for a US national bank trust charter... Read more