CCI's 10 Antitrust Directives On Android That Have Spooked Google

has been jolted after the Indian antitrust authority sought changes to how it markets its system, which powers 97% of smartphones in the world's second biggest mobile market.

As a Jan. 19 deadline approaches, the U.S. firm has asked the Supreme Court to put on hold the directives of the Competition Commission of India (CCI), arguing that they risk stalling growth of its ecosystem in the country.

licenses the system to smartphone makers, but critics say its restrictions are anti-competitive. The U.S. firm says provides more choice for everyone and such pacts help keep the operating system free.

has said that the changes sought by would result in the most far-reaching alterations for the Android mobile platform in the last 14 to 15 years.

Here are the authority's 10 directives:

* Google should not be allowed to license its Play Store, from which users download mobile apps, on condition that device manufacturers pre-install Google apps such as YouTube, Gmail or the Chrome browser.

* Google should not force device makers to pre-install a bouquet of apps or decide their placement.

* Google should be restrained from striking agreements that ensure exclusivity for its search services on smart devices.

* Google should not restrict smartphone users from removing its pre-installed such as Google Maps, Gmail and Youtube, which currently cannot be deleted from Android phones, on which they are supplied pre-installed.

* Google should let users pick a search engine of choice for all relevant services when setting up a phone for the first time.

* Google should not impose any curbs in India on the practice of "sideloading", or downloading apps without using its app store.

* Google should allow third-party app stores to be hosted on Google's Play Store.

* Competitors and app developers should not be denied access to the programming interface of Google Play services, the underlying software system that powers Android devices. This directive is meant to ensure compatibility between apps on Play Store and third-party app stores based on Android variants, the antitrust authority has said.

* Google should not incentivise or obligate manufacturers for not selling smart devices based on Android variants.

* The asked Google not to restrict makers of Android smartphones from developing other devices, such as tablets or TVs based on modified versions of Android.

(This story has not been edited by Business Standard staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

RECENT NEWS

Rising Rates, Rising Challenges: Bankers Adapt To Serve Troubled Companies In A Changing Economic Landscape

As interest rates climb, troubled companies are facing heightened financial pressures, prompting them to seek assistance... Read more

The Elusive Nature Of Fraud Detection: Exploring The Auditor's Dilemma

In the intricate world of financial reporting, auditors serve as guardians of integrity, tasked with uncovering discrepa... Read more

The Battle For Depositors: US Lenders Ramp Up Efforts Amidst Rate Uncertainty

In the competitive landscape of the US banking sector, retaining depositors is paramount for lenders seeking to maintain... Read more

Beyond Capital: Unveiling The Complexities Of Bank Failure Prediction

In the realm of banking, the ability to predict and prevent failures is paramount for financial stability and consumer c... Read more

Central Banks And The Economic Horizon: Steering Through Uncertaintie

In the evolving landscape of global financial markets, the strategic role of central banks has come under intense scruti... Read more

Transforming Financial Operations With Robotic Process Automation

Author: Ricardo Goulart                           ... Read more