Android Case: CCI's Rs 1,337 Crore Fine Unreasonable, Google Tells NCLAT

on Thursday told the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) that the Competition Commission of India (CCI) order imposing a fine of Rs 1,337.76 crore on it for allegedly misusing its dominant position in the ecosystem was without any inquiry or analysis.

The counsel told the bench of Chairperson Justice Ashok Bhushan and Dr Alok Srivastava, member (technical), the competition regulator’s findings that was trying to abuse its dominance by pushing Google Chrome into phones were devoid of a proper analysis.

“They (CCI) say Google apps can only be disabled. The question then is how much additional space the uninstallation will free, and if disabling slows the device. There is not an iota of finding on this. There is no inquiry or analysis on whether this has any effect on running of the device,” Google’s counsel argued.

The tech giant also said CCI itself had recognised that Google’s Mobile Application Distribution Agreement (MADA) was beneficial to Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs). Once recognised, there can be no imposition of unfair terms, OEMs are free to install any other browser on the system, and, unlike Apple devices till 2020, Google Chrome is not the default browser on systems, it submitted.

“The charge against Google is that by pre-installing Google Chrome, it is ousting somebody. The ban was imposed on UC Browser in June 2020. In the first six months that year, the app was downloaded over 104 million times. The figure is from Google Play Store. Can we even counter that there is an exclusion on account of my MADA? None of this has been considered in the CCI order,” Google told the appellate tribunal.

The bench will continue hearing the matter on February 23.

The Competition Commission of India’s (CCI’s) on October 20, 2022, penalised the tech giant and asked it to pay Rs 1337.76 crore for practices related to Android devices. Google was earlier given three months to comply with the CCI’s directive and its deadline was January 19. The tech giant then moved the on December 22, 2022, and on January 4, the appellate tribunal asked Google to pay 10 per cent of Rs 1337.76 in three weeks and posted the matter for hearing on April 3. Seeking relief, Google then moved the apex court.

After the SC refused to grant interim relief to Google on January 19, the matter was sent back to for the final order.

RECENT NEWS

Rising Rates, Rising Challenges: Bankers Adapt To Serve Troubled Companies In A Changing Economic Landscape

As interest rates climb, troubled companies are facing heightened financial pressures, prompting them to seek assistance... Read more

The Elusive Nature Of Fraud Detection: Exploring The Auditor's Dilemma

In the intricate world of financial reporting, auditors serve as guardians of integrity, tasked with uncovering discrepa... Read more

The Battle For Depositors: US Lenders Ramp Up Efforts Amidst Rate Uncertainty

In the competitive landscape of the US banking sector, retaining depositors is paramount for lenders seeking to maintain... Read more

Beyond Capital: Unveiling The Complexities Of Bank Failure Prediction

In the realm of banking, the ability to predict and prevent failures is paramount for financial stability and consumer c... Read more

Central Banks And The Economic Horizon: Steering Through Uncertaintie

In the evolving landscape of global financial markets, the strategic role of central banks has come under intense scruti... Read more

Transforming Financial Operations With Robotic Process Automation

Author: Ricardo Goulart                           ... Read more